comparison-of-reto-ultra-wide-slim-and-kodak-ultra-f9-compare-bnv.jpg

Comparison of Reto Ultra Wide & Slim and Kodak Ultra F9

How do the Reto Ultra Wide & Slim and Kodak Ultra F9 differ?

The Reto Ultra Wide & Slim and the Kodak Ultra F9 are two viewfinder cameras that have made a name for themselves in modern photography. Both use the 35mm / 35mm format and are manufactured in China. Despite their similarities, there are also some differences between them that could be crucial for potential buyers.


Technical Specifications

FeatureReto Ultra Wide & SlimKodak Ultra F9
Camera TypeViewfinder cameraViewfinder camera
Film format35mm35mm
Digital SensorNoNo
Film TransportManualManual
Film Transport MechanismThumbwheel
Picture Format36 mm x 24 mm36 mm x 24 mm
Lens typeFixed lensFixed lens
Focal Length22 mm31 mm
Maximum Aperturef/11f/9
Light MeterNoNo
FlashBuilt-in flash
FocusFixed focusFixed focus
Weight69170
Size10 x 5.9 x 2.8 cm11.9 x 6.7 x 4.4 cm
Release Date20222021
Production start20222021
ManufacturerRetoKodak
Country of OriginChinaChina
AgeUp to 4 yearsUp to 5 years
Power Supply1x AAA battery

Common features

Both the Reto Ultra Wide & Slim and the Kodak Ultra F9 are fixed focus viewfinder cameras with a close focus distance of 100 cm. Both cameras have similar exposure times - the Reto Ultra Wide & Slim has an exposure time of 1/125 sec, while the Kodak Ultra F9 has an exposure time of 1/120 sec. Neither camera has a built-in light meter, tripod socket, cable release or self-timer. Film advance is manual on both cameras.

Differences

Focal length and flash

A major difference between the two cameras is the focal length and flash function. The Reto Ultra Wide & Slim has a focal length of 22 mm and does not have a built-in flash. This might make it more attractive to photographers who like to shoot wide-angle and take advantage of natural light.

The Kodak Ultra F9, on the other hand, has a focal length of 31 mm and a built-in flash. So this camera might be more suitable for photographers who prefer a longer focal length and want the flexibility to shoot in low light conditions.

Battery

Another difference between the two cameras is in their power supply. The Kodak Ultra F9 requires a AAA battery, while the Reto Ultra Wide & Slim does not. This could be an advantage for the Reto Ultra Wide & Slim, as it has no ongoing battery costs and is always ready to go as long as you have film.

Size and Weight

The Reto Ultra Wide & Slim is both smaller and lighter than the Kodak Ultra F9. Measuring 10 x 5.9 x 2.8 cm and weighing only 69 g, it is a compact and portable option. The Kodak Ultra F9 is slightly larger and heavier, measuring 11.9 x 6.7 x 4.4 cm and weighing 170 g.

Conclusion

Deciding between the Reto Ultra Wide & Slim* and the Kodak Ultra F9* depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you're looking for a lightweight, compact camera that allows wide-angle shooting and doesn't require a battery, the Reto Ultra Wide & Slim might be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a longer focal length and appreciate the flexibility of a built-in flash, the Kodak Ultra F9 might be a better fit for you