How do the Reto Ultra Wide & Slim and Kodak Ultra F9 differ?
The Reto Ultra Wide & Slim and the Kodak Ultra F9 are two viewfinder cameras that have made a name for themselves in modern photography. Both use the 35mm / 35mm format and are manufactured in China. Despite their similarities, there are also some differences between them that could be crucial for potential buyers.
Kodak Ultra F9 | Reto Ultra Wide & Slim | |
---|---|---|
Type | Viewfinder camera | Viewfinder camera |
Format | 35mm | 35mm |
Release | 2021 | 2022 |
Focal length | 31 mm | 22 mm |
Focus | Fixed | Fixed |
Minimum focus distance | 100 cm | 100 cm |
Shutter speeds | 1/120 s | 1/125 s |
Light meter | No | No |
Date imprinting | No | No |
Double and/or multiple exposure function | No | No |
Flash | Built-in flash | - |
Tripod mount | No | No |
Cable release | No | No |
Self-timer | No | No |
Film transport | Manual | Manual |
Battery | 1x AAA battery | Not necessary |
Size | 11,9 x 6,7 x 4,4 cm | 10 x 5,9 x 2,8 cm |
Weight | 170 g | 69 g |
Manufacturer | Sino Promise | - |
Country of production | China | China |
Common features
Both the Reto Ultra Wide & Slim and the Kodak Ultra F9 are fixed focus viewfinder cameras with a close focus distance of 100 cm. Both cameras have similar exposure times – the Reto Ultra Wide & Slim has an exposure time of 1/125 sec, while the Kodak Ultra F9 has an exposure time of 1/120 sec. Neither camera has a built-in light meter, tripod socket, cable release or self-timer. Film advance is manual on both cameras.
Differences
Focal length and flash
A major difference between the two cameras is the focal length and flash function. The Reto Ultra Wide & Slim has a focal length of 22 mm and does not have a built-in flash. This might make it more attractive to photographers who like to shoot wide-angle and take advantage of natural light.
The Kodak Ultra F9, on the other hand, has a focal length of 31 mm and a built-in flash. So this camera might be more suitable for photographers who prefer a longer focal length and want the flexibility to shoot in low light conditions.
Battery
Another difference between the two cameras is in their power supply. The Kodak Ultra F9 requires a AAA battery, while the Reto Ultra Wide & Slim does not. This could be an advantage for the Reto Ultra Wide & Slim, as it has no ongoing battery costs and is always ready to go as long as you have film.
Size and Weight
The Reto Ultra Wide & Slim is both smaller and lighter than the Kodak Ultra F9. Measuring 10 x 5.9 x 2.8 cm and weighing only 69 g, it is a compact and portable option. The Kodak Ultra F9 is slightly larger and heavier, measuring 11.9 x 6.7 x 4.4 cm and weighing 170 g.
Conclusion
Deciding between the Reto Ultra Wide & Slim* and the Kodak Ultra F9* depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you’re looking for a lightweight, compact camera that allows wide-angle shooting and doesn’t require a battery, the Reto Ultra Wide & Slim might be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a longer focal length and appreciate the flexibility of a built-in flash, the Kodak Ultra F9 might be a better fit for you